Navworx is no longer - iFly General Discussions - iFly EFB

iFly GPS Forum

We have a new Forum!  Go here to get started: https://adventurepilot.community.forum.  
The new forum is easier to use and much more capable than the old, we hope you will join our community! 

Below is a copy of the old forum. This will remain available for a short period so you can access and review the information contained here. To continue a conversation, or start a new one, please register and create a post at our new forum location.
HomeHomeDiscussionsDiscussionsiFly General Di...iFly General Di...Navworx is no longerNavworx is no longer
Previous
 
Next
New Post
10/21/2017 6:51 PM
 

I bought a unit recently with the intent of using my GTN650 as a WAAS source, and was assure that this was OK. There are some people in the loop that appear to be very stupid. Why can some UAT units be acceptable for sport and experimental aircraft and not for certified ones, we all use the same airspace. And if the WAAS chip is the problem why can I not go ahead using my GTN650 as a source? Size 12 boots need to be applied firmly to some backsides here!

 
New Post
10/22/2017 10:38 AM
 

Mike:

 

A friend has ordered the Uavionics ECHO unit. It measures about 2 x 2". He also bought the WAAS to go with it. Looks like total cost will be in the range of $1500-$1600. Also, it needs no hard wire connection to the transponder. The unit just picks up the transponder output and processes it.

He will receive it on Thursday so we should be able to teast it over the weekend. I will report.

It is supposed to work with IFLY.

John M

 
New Post
10/22/2017 3:32 PM
 

Deleted

 
New Post
10/24/2017 10:04 AM
 

Certified aircraft have to use TSOd equipment while Experimental can use the equipment if it adheres to the required functionality and doesn't requier the more costly TSO cert.

Even us "stupid" people know that.

 

 
New Post
10/25/2017 1:12 PM
 

I think everyone understands the regs on this.

Maybe you were trying to be ironic or tongue-in-cheek, but I think you missed the poster's point: if both certified and non-certified aircraft are sharing the same airspace, why is it so important that the certified ones have TSO'd equipment, while the others don't?  How does it make it safer that just some of the aircraft have TSO'd equipment?  Or would make it unsafer if everyone used non-TSO'd?  If non-TSO'd equipment is unsafe, why are they allowing a goodly portion of the fleet to use it?

It doesn't bother me.  My aircraft are experimentals, and they're set with ADS-B in/out.  But this is one of the major reasons that I *don't* own a certified aircraft.


Powrachute PC 2000; Aventura II; Cherokee 180
 
Previous
 
Next
HomeHomeDiscussionsDiscussionsiFly General Di...iFly General Di...Navworx is no longerNavworx is no longer