Navworx in trouble - iFly General Discussions - iFly EFB

iFly GPS Forum

We have a new Forum!  Go here to get started: https://adventurepilot.community.forum.  
The new forum is easier to use and much more capable than the old, we hope you will join our community! 

Below is a copy of the old forum. This will remain available for a short period so you can access and review the information contained here. To continue a conversation, or start a new one, please register and create a post at our new forum location.
HomeHomeDiscussionsDiscussionsiFly General Di...iFly General Di...Navworx in troubleNavworx in trouble
Previous
 
Next
New Post
10/20/2016 1:10 PM
 

https://www.aopa.org/news-and-media/all-news/2016/october/20/faa-seeks-removal-of-navworx-uats

The FAA wants some Navworx UAT's immediately removed from service for non-compliance.


Jeff Nokomis Clark, Mooney M20G, iFly app on ASUS ZenPad Z8s, ASUS ZenFone AR, ASUS Windows 10 tablet, Stratux ADS-B w AHRS
 
New Post
10/21/2016 11:52 AM
 

I just read the proposed AD NPRM. It includes the Navworx Model ADS600-EXP P/N 200-8013. I see that the p/n in the store here has a different number. I fly an RV7 with the iFly mounted in the panel. I had intended to add the Navworx after the first of the year. It may be a little early, but I'm wondering if the current unit is OK and does the #200-8012 still have the 1080 receiver as well as the "OK" GPS? Thanks, Bob

 
New Post
10/21/2016 12:21 PM
 

It's actually 200-8013 for EXP model. There is no 8012, all EXPs models are the 8013 number. There is only one ADS600-EXP that I show on the parts list from NavWorx. I just made sure that our store SKU matches theirs. According to Bill, all NavWorx models have the 978 and 1090 receivers, however the navworx software is not currently using that data on the "Certified" models.

The only models not affected by this UPN and proposed AD is the original 0112 and 0113 models. We should know more early next week according to NavWorx. We have temporarily stopped selling these models until more details and information is ironed out.


Shane Woodson
Vice President | Adventure Pilot LLC.
 
New Post
10/22/2016 11:19 AM
 

The FAA wants some Navworx UAT's immediately removed from service for non-compliance.


I don't see anything "immediate" about removing the NavWork units. This is a proposed AD and the comment period is open until December 19, 2016. I would assume should the AD become effective, the compliance date would be at least sometime after the comment period date!

However, I do admit to being somewhat confused about compliance ... how does the proposed AD reconcile with the fact that EAB's are not subject to AD's? I guess one could argue that the subject of the AD represents "an unsafe condition" and the FAR's say that no pilot can "operate an aircraft unless it is an airworthy condition" ???

 
New Post
10/22/2016 11:24 AM
 
From AOPA

"FAA QUESTIONS COMPLIANCE OF SOME NAVWORX UATS
CERTAIN ADS600-B UNITS DON’T MEET TSO SPECS, AGENCY SAYS

October 18, 2016 By Mike Collins

The FAA issued an unapproved parts notification Oct. 14 affecting specific NavWorx, Inc. model ADS600-B remote-mounted universal access transceivers (UATs). The products provide Automatic Dependent Surveillance-Broadcast (ADS-B) Out and In on the 978 MHz frequency.

NavWorx part numbers 200-0012 and 200-0013, with software release 4.0.6 through 4.1.0, are affected by the notification. The unapproved parts notification follows reports from aircraft owners that the NavWorx UATs could not be selected in the FAA’s online ADS-B rebate application form.

An FAA investigation determined that those ADS600-B UATs, delivered or updated with the specified software releases, do not meet the minimum performance standards specified in TSO C-154c—even if they are marked with the TSO number and all markings specifically required by that TSO, according to the FAA’s unapproved part notification. The TSO establishes specifications for ADS-B equipment operating on the 978 MHz UAT frequency.
“These models indicate that they are broadcasting with the integrity required by 14 CFR 91.227; however, they contain an internal commercial GPS unit that has not been shown to meet the ADS-B Out performance requirements of 14 CFR 91.227,” the FAA said in its notification. “As a result, the operation of these units could result in an unsafe condition in the national airspace system due to the transmission of inaccurate aircraft position data.” NavWorx ADS600-B UATs with part numbers 200-0112 and 200-0113 contain an approved GPS position source and are not covered by the notice, according to the FAA.

The FAA recommends that affected NavWorx UATs installed in an aircraft not be operated, and should be removed or deactivated, the notification states.

“The products are designed and were tested and manufactured to meet the 2020 rule,” NavWorx said in a statement provided Oct. 17 by NavWorx President Bill Moffitt. “We are working with the FAA to rescind the UPN and get the product established on the FAA rebate website. We remain committed to supporting our present and future customers.

“FAA certified our products three years ago,” the NavWorx statement continued. “At that time our testing demonstrated that the products’ GPS module met 91.227(c) integrity. Nevertheless, the FAA required that we output at an integrity level lower than our testing demonstrated. But, even with the lower integrity output, the FAA assured us the products would receive traffic. Unfortunately, this January the FAA changed their system to stop sending traffic to our products for reasons unconnected to the performance or integrity of our products.

“By changing their system after issuing certification of our products, the FAA knowingly and intentionally modified the functionality of our products in a manner that deprived our customers of information intended to improve safety in the NAS. NavWorx notified the FAA of this problem and for some time has been working with the FAA to address this issue to maintain NAS safety.”

“AOPA is still monitoring the situation, but at this stage, this is a commercial issue that NavWorx needs to address with its customers,” said Justin Barkowski, AOPA director of regulatory issues.

Mike Collins Mike Collins Technical Editor Mike Collins has worked for AOPA’s media network since 1994. He holds a private pilot certificate with an instrument rating. GO TO MIKE COLLINS'S PROFILE"
 
Previous
 
Next
HomeHomeDiscussionsDiscussionsiFly General Di...iFly General Di...Navworx in troubleNavworx in trouble