JoesPiper wrote:
Its just clutter and a lot of it. Another reason for ADS-B. Instead of being distracted by clutter, you see what TRACON sees with ADS-B. Paper charts don't have the clutter. Also, where Bravo flies, VFR DOES NOT in the Denver Bravo. As far as the Springs area, most get flight following.
Whole purpose of IFR Charts.
I think you're confused about charting and the products available. iFly is not adding anything to the FAA charts. The charts you see in iFly (and any other EFB) are exact digital copies of what the FAA produces. So yes, the "clutter" you mention is also on the paper TAC charts (while you can still get paper charts in this digital world). Maybe you've never seen a paper TAC since the TAC is a seperate chart from the Sectional chart. Its purpose is to give specific detail in high traffic areas such as Bravo airspace, so the VFR pilot can make intelligent decisions when flying in the area. A TAC covers more than just the Bravo airspace. It covers the area where IFR traffic is transitioning from the enroute phase to the terminal phase, which is where most VFR traffic will be. Knowing where IFR traffic is likely to be when flying VFR in, near, or over congested airspace is important to some VFR pilots. In fact, the FAA encourages the use of the TAC right on the Sectional:
I suggest you go to skyvector.com and zoom into the Denver area on the Sectional chart. Then click back and forth between the Sectional chart and the TAC (buttons are near the top right of the screen) and you'll see that the TAC is actually much cleaner than the Sectional.
If you don't want the TAC ("clutter") shown in iFly, I told you in the previous post how to avoid it. If you'd like to complain to those responsible for the "clutter", the address is:
FAA, Aeronautical Information Services
1305 East-West Hwy
Silver Spring, MD 20910
(202) 267-5001
Also: TRACON, approach, and tower radar do not and never will see all traffic, and neither will ADS-B. Don't be fooled into thinking it will.