iFly GPS Forum

We have a new Forum!  Go here to get started: https://adventurepilot.community.forum.  
The new forum is easier to use and much more capable than the old, we hope you will join our community! 

Below is a copy of the old forum. This will remain available for a short period so you can access and review the information contained here. To continue a conversation, or start a new one, please register and create a post at our new forum location.
HomeHomeDiscussionsDiscussionsiFly Wish-ListiFly Wish-ListDisplay more weather informationDisplay more weather information
Previous
 
Next
New Post
7/28/2015 3:10 PM
 

Great question. Our focus is to be the best in-flight app. To that end we try to keep the UI intuitive, text and buttons are large and clearly marked, the most common features are just a couple taps away, and the less common "advanced" features are designed to be easy to access - but not as prominent (EG, "More Options" buttons).

All new development passes through this filter: Who will benefit by this change? Is it easy to understand without having to be explained? Will it affect or detract from current app usability? We then very carefully select & design features that have the most benefit without compromising usability.

Recently we've introduced some fairly dramatic changes. Version 8, for example, dropped the round buttons and went to a button bar design, adding some floating dynamic buttons for re-center airplane, alerts, etc. This affected everyone and did prompt a mild learning curve. Version 9 added Seamless Charts, and the Quick-Info Popup. We made these changes eyes-wide-open; the UI refresh was a necessary step towards our goal: Be the best in-flight app. Now, other than some tuning, I think the big UI changes are behind us. But we still have a lot of great ideas in the queue, and we have a platform ready to expand and accept these changes without such hard impact to the filters I mentioned above.

We're not trying to recreate every feature found in the other apps. We're not going to do something because our competitor did it, nor are we going to do something because it's cool or neat. But if we can make a change that will save most pilots time, or make the flight safer, or make planning easier, you can be sure it's going to be considered.

Cheers,
Walter


Walter Boyd
President, Adventure Pilot
 
New Post
7/28/2015 4:25 PM
 

Old Pilot a very good point but I have to disagree. Walter's explanation is important as he states the mission; making the best inflight software. Thisis exactl why I signed up for Iflygps as I could see the diferences with FF. But in my point of view planning my flight is an important part too. If this team says we are focussing on the inflight experience that is completlyl fine and I will find the resource for preflight somewhere else. This is not a problem. I cant wait to try it out inflight as I am certain I like it better that FF. It is very warm and humid in Maryland at the moment, trying to find a time window where it is bearable.

Thanks to you both for your replies!

Peter

 
New Post
7/28/2015 9:54 PM
 

Since this started with a request for more weather information, I have a question/suggestion. Perhaps you could use the old teletype cloud cover symbols on map pages to save space. They are only one character, and easily understood.

Using http://www.abstractfonts.com/font/13554

Clear = the last character, a circle

Overcast = third character on the 5th line, a circle with a plus in it.

Broken = 7th character on the first line, a circle with two vertical lines

Scattered = 6th character on the first line, a circle with one vertical line.

Few didn't exist. Perhaps a circle with a horizontal line.

 
New Post
7/28/2015 10:34 PM
 
Peter Morssink wrote:

Old Pilot a very good point but I have to disagree. Walter's explanation is important as he states the mission; making the best inflight software. Thisis exactl why I signed up for Iflygps as I could see the diferences with FF. But in my point of view planning my flight is an important part too. If this team says we are focussing on the inflight experience that is completlyl fine and I will find the resource for preflight somewhere else. This is not a problem. I cant wait to try it out inflight as I am certain I like it better that FF. It is very warm and humid in Maryland at the moment, trying to find a time window where it is bearable.

Thanks to you both for your replies!

Peter

You have to disagree with what? I just asked a question.

 
New Post
7/29/2015 9:50 AM
 
Peter Morssink wrote:

[snip]...But in my point of view planning my flight is an important part too. If this team says we are focussing on the inflight experience that is completlyl fine and I will find the resource for preflight somewhere else. [snip]

For clarity, Flight Planning is a huge component of any navigation app. Support for efficient and safe flight planning within the iFly software is integral to our mission. Much of this planning is done in-flight...EG, routing around storms, fuel stops, emergency routing, IFR changes, etc, etc. Flight Planning comprises some of the most complex tasks a pilot performs with their navigation tool, so keeping this easy, effective, feature rich, and usable in-flight is a top priority. And I think we're acomplishing this pretty well.


Walter Boyd
President, Adventure Pilot
 
Previous
 
Next
HomeHomeDiscussionsDiscussionsiFly Wish-ListiFly Wish-ListDisplay more weather informationDisplay more weather information