That's good to know, but not relevant.
AP has repeatedly said that iFlyGPS is not going away, and is not going to be completely abandoned, even if most resources will go toward EFB. This is not a request to add a new iFlyGPS feature, it's a comment about how current behavior is problematic.
Is "too bad, so sad" really AP's final answer, here?
Even if it is, perhaps there's some additional info you could share to make it a little more understandable. "We've looked at multiple options to make that better, and they all would take more resources than we think it makes sense to expend," or whatever.