iFly GPS Forum

We have a new Forum!  Go here to get started: https://adventurepilot.community.forum.  
The new forum is easier to use and much more capable than the old, we hope you will join our community! 

Below is a copy of the old forum. This will remain available for a short period so you can access and review the information contained here. To continue a conversation, or start a new one, please register and create a post at our new forum location.
HomeHomeDiscussionsDiscussionsiFly General Di...iFly General Di...WAASWAAS
Previous
 
Next
New Post
11/15/2012 12:58 PM
 

FWIW

I fly Dynon's Skyveiw with an IFly for a back up. Dynon will soon ship thier ADSB receiver so I looked into how GPS sources are used by ADSB. It turns out that the Extended Squitter message from your ADSB (out) transponder contains a position source quality value. This tells all listening just how good the position fix you are reporting is. When using the non-TSO'd Dynon puck (integrated receiver/antenna) the transponder reports the fix quality as unknown. I suspect this means that ATC will not/can not use it for primary seperation.

I looked into this with an eye towards 2020 ADSB compliance. Hopefully someone out there is working on an inexpensive TSO'd puck to act as a certified position source for the ADSB out transponders.

 
New Post
12/7/2012 10:13 AM
 
Re: WAAS  Modified By henrysamson  on 12/7/2012 11:42:31 AM
Another opinion on enabling WAAS.

I originally bought a 720 several months ago for use in my soon to be completed homebuilt. It couples with my Dynon D10A beautifully. I also instruct part time and have been using it while I teach. Being able to map a past flight has been really useful during the post flight briefing. I use it with the battery pack and the external antenna. I recently bought a Nexus 7 for primarily non-aviation use. But since I have it I have been trying the various aviation applications. The internal GPS antenna in the Nexus will not work when it is on my knee board. But neither did the iFly, hence the external antenna. So I purchased a bluetooth GPS to use with it. This GPS is WAAS enabled. The difference is not really noticeable with respect to horizontal position but really makes a difference with altitude. The altitude supplied by the WAAS enabled GPS stays within 10-15 feet of the barometric altitude vs about 50-75 feet for the iFly. I feel that this difference is really important. For a couple of reasons: Use as a cross check and backup altitude to catch altimeter problems (or an improperly set altimeter) and for integration with the terrain avoidance feature of the iFly.

From a marketing point of view, the iFly is competing with some really inexpensive systems. For example, a Nexus 7 costs $199.00 with the GPS and additional $49.00. The Garmin Pilot android app (one that I am trying) is $49.00 for a year (not including geo-referenced approach plates). There are MANY features of the iFly that I prefer over the Garmin app and a few on the Garmin app I would like to see on the iFly but it is a cheap alternative and for me it is a backup to the iFly.

I say go with WAAS for the iFly if it can be done.


 
New Post
12/7/2012 10:33 AM
 
Re: WAAS  Modified By Cobra  on 12/7/2012 10:33:39 AM
henrysamson wrote:

I say go with WAAS for the iFly if it can be done.

So does Walter: http://ifly.adventurepilot.com/SUPPOR...

 
New Post
12/7/2012 11:40 AM
 
Cobra wrote:
henrysamson wrote:

I say go with WAAS for the iFly if it can be done.

So does Walter: http://ifly.adventurepilot.com/SUPPOR...



Thanks for pointing this out to me. That's what I get for reading the forum while not signed in!

Henry
 
New Post
12/7/2012 7:43 PM
 

Henry, I am curious what you couple betweent he iFly and the Dynon D10A?

 
Previous
 
Next
HomeHomeDiscussionsDiscussionsiFly General Di...iFly General Di...WAASWAAS