Jim Fitzgerald wrote IN PART:This whole topic confuses me. Here's how I deal with it. I'm pretty sure my GPS is accurate to within a few feet. I pretty much always use the published sectionals ........... So then it comes down to how well does the app I'm using accurately display my GPS position on the chart. I have NEVER seen any evidence it is not completely precise and accurate. It's easy enough to see that when you are sitting on the airport. So, then it comes down to what is the controller looking at? Since that is outside of my control, I steer clear of airspace I am not intending to enter by at least a few miles. Works for me.
Apologies for posting this text in more than one reply, but it appears that the last two posters at least didn't see this note from me I posted yesterday:
...................................................
I now believe that 99% of this disparity can be explained as follows:
Apparently the iFly Sectional diagram shows the radius of the MFR airspace as 5 statute miles.
As far as I know both the iFly and the sectional (from which iFly gets the data) are officially correct in doing that.
I just called the MFR tower and spoke to a controller there and he said they use 5 NAUTICAL MILES (which is 5.75 statute miles) as their radius.
That would perfectly explain why they are seeing me as about 3/4th of a mile inside their airspace when my moving map iFly is showing I am just at their perimeter.
If this resolves it (and I think it does) the remaining questions are
1) should they be using 5nm radius (I am not sure I want to go down that path of discussion with them)?
2) are other control towers doing this?
Thanks to Jim's and Walter's comments that led me realize that possible explaination, and thus to pick up the phone and ask them if they used 5nm for their radius.